Κυριακή 16 Μαΐου 2021

 

SOUND THE NOTE OF LOVE,

INVOKE THE SOUL RAY,
PERMIT THE CHRIST SPIRIT ENTRANCE

­DISTANCE GROUP MEDITATION
 – EVERY SUNDAY AT 21.00 –
for invoking Soul Ray of Greece, Nations and One Humanity

Μay 16, 2021

Text read by sister E.S.: 




RULE ELEVEN

 I would like to speak, at this point in our discussion of the fourteen rules for initiates, upon the theme of group initiation; these rules are those to which groups that are seeking, in unison, a group expansion of consciousness, must learn to conform.  It is for this reason that I have hitherto omitted to go into detail in relating these rules to the seven centres or, specifically, to the great seven solar initiations.  Of these seven initiations only five concern average humanity.  The remaining two initiations concern only those who are willing to meet certain unusual requirements and to produce that special effort which entitles them to the appellation, "Victors, through the clear pure will."

 Group initiation is no easy achievement, particularly as it is practically an untried experiment and constitutes essentially a pioneering effort.  That such a development was inevitable, if the evolutionary growth of humanity proved in any way satisfactory, was early realised by the Hierarchy.  However, it has taken millenia of years to make it seem—as an hypothetical effort—in any way possible, and only tentative experiments have as yet been attempted.  The first objective of these experiments (going on quietly in various places all over the world) is to see if a group of disciples can work together in such a manner that an inner fusion can be seen—by the Masters—to be taking place.  The results, hitherto, have not been encouraging.  It has, for one thing, been difficult to find disciples who are approximately at the same point in evolution, whose rays are "shining through" adequately, and who can evidence some one quality, or some controlling theme (if I may use such a phrase) which they share in unison and which would suffice to hold them together and prove strong enough to offset personality differences, preferences and barriers.  It has not been possible, as yet, to do this.  Group after group has been tried and tested out by different Masters in various parts of the world, and hitherto all such attempts have proved failures.  When I use the word "failure" I mean failure from [Page 209] the angle of the planned objective.  From the angle of the individual growth of any particular disciple there has not necessarily been failure; from the angle of the unwitting, general public, the publication of Discipleship in the New Age will prove in years to come an epochal success.

 It might be of value to consider briefly what group initiation involves, and to do this factually and not sentimentally and aspirationally.

 One of the problems confronting the Hierarchy in this connection is the elimination of sentiment—that curious, emotional reaction and relationship which links all the members of a group together in the bonds of liking or disliking.  Where there is liking, then too strong a personality relation is established, as far as the good of the group is concerned.  The group equilibrium is disturbed.  Where there is disliking, the inner faculty of rebuff works constantly, and cleavages then occur.  Is it not true, my brothers, that your relation to each other is frequently subjected to the impact of approval or of disapproval?  When that attitude exists, the first steps towards group fusion are absent.  This is what we mean by sentiment, and this emotional reaction must disappear as a preliminary stage.  I speak not at this time anent impersonality.  For some people, impersonality is simply an escape mechanism from responsibility; for others, it connotes suppression and entails such hard labour that the entire time of the disciple is given to the achievement of impersonality, thereby guaranteeing non-success.  That at which you strenuously strive and which assumes undue place in your thinking, in due time becomes itself a prison and merits later destruction.  Such is the occult law.  Impersonality is possible only to the disciple who knows truly how to love, and to him who sees life and its phantasmagoria (including all associated persons) in the light of the Spiritual Triad.

 It is to this that Rule XI primarily refers, and it will not be possible for you to comprehend the significance of this rule unless there is a measure of clarity in your minds anent true group relationships.  Such relationships are not [Page 210] based upon personality or impersonality, or upon liking or disliking, or on criticism or non-criticism, but upon a real comprehension of "divine indifference," spiritual detachment and deep, persistent, unchanging love.  To many earnest aspirants the juxtaposition of these phrases will seem paradoxical; but an understanding of the occult paradoxes tends to liberation.  In the comprehension of these basic attitudes lies the first lesson of the aspirant to participation in group initiation.

 The second point which the group thus striving has to grasp is the necessity for the utilisation of the force of destruction.

 A group is brought together under karmic law, ashramic necessity and soul direction.  Immediately there is presented to the watching Masters an opportunity for the very definite training of some willing aspirants, but also an equally definite point of tension, indicating real difficulty.  There is little, in reality, to link these people except inclination, a joint aspiration and a goal seen and held in unison.  The outstanding characteristic of such a group is spiritual selfishness.  This statement may surprise you until a close scrutiny of your own heart is undergone, and then I venture to predict that you will discover that it is not divine love of humanity that has enabled you to find your way into the outer group of some Ashram but desire for development, for achievement and for liberation.  The first step, therefore, is to recognise this and hence the injunction so oft misunderstood:  Kill out desire.  This has to be the first destructive activity of the disciple.  It is not what the disciple seeks, or wants or desires which should condition him and drive him to what we might call "ashramic acquiescence," but the all-impelling motive of world need.  So the disciple begins to rid himself of desire by a process of attrition.  He does not positively fight desire with a view to its elimination; he does not seek to transmute it (as should the probationary disciple), but he ceases to give it any recognition; he fails to provide it with the needed stimulation of attention, for as ever, energy follows thought; he is preoccupied [Page 211] with world need and with the service he can render, and—almost inadvertently, as it were—desire dies of attrition.

 It will be apparent to you, therefore, that it will take time for all the members of a group to achieve the destruction of individual desire, and that until some measure of this united liberating process is attained, the group cannot go forward together as a unit on the Way of Initiation.

 The next step is the destruction of the ties which link the personalities of the group members.  These must be severed, and the relation between the group members must be on the basis of soul activity, joint pledge to the Master of the Ashram, and a united service given to humanity.  There comes a point of freedom in the group relation which will demonstrate in some definitely planned and united activity, carried forward in the outer world but enriching the life of the Ashram.  Until this stage is reached, the activity of the group corresponds to that of the probationary disciple and not to that of the pledged disciple.  The spontaneously emerging group work, engendered by the group consciousness and fusing the entire group of disciples at a point of tension in service, is the first indication that the group is ready for further teaching, for an intensification of its group potency and for a closer relation to the Master.  This has all been brought about by the group itself, independently of any injunction of the Master, and as a result of the united soul life of the group effectively making its presence felt.  These two spiritually destructive processes—the destruction of desire and the severing of all personality ties—are the first two and essential results of true group work.

The third quality which must be utterly rooted out and destroyed is that of all reaction towards recognition, whether that recognition is accorded by the world of men, by other disciples, or by the Master.  The ability to work without any token of recognition, to see others claim the reward of action taken, and even to be unaware that the results of the good initiated by the individual disciple or [Page 212] his group are claimed by others, are the hallmarks of the hierarchical worker.  The Masters get no recognition for the work done by Their disciples, though They initiated the original impulse and have given both guidance and direction; the disciple carries out the Plan; he shoulders the responsibility; he pays the price, either good or bad, or the karmic results of instituted activity, and he is the one who gains the recognition of the crowd.  But—until the disciple seeks no recognition, until he fails to think in terms of results and is unaware of the reaction of the world to his work as an individual disciple—he has yet far to go in order to gain the higher initiations.  The entire problem becomes increasingly difficult when an entire ashramic group is concerned, for the recognition of the group service seems little to ask from the world which is served; nevertheless, such a demand and such an expectation delay the complete absorption of the group into the inner Ashram.

These are not, however, impossible objectives, or I would not waste your time or mine in their delineation.  The group can measure up to the occult necessity if unitedly they recognise the scope of the endeavour and unitedly strive for complete absorption in service—an absorption so deep that it excludes all other recognitions, particularly those of a personal nature.  We come back, therefore (as is continually the case), to the fact that when a group can arrive at a suitable point of united tension, non-essential reactions disappear and undesirable qualities are automatically removed.

These three types of work along the lines of destruction merit your careful consideration and—because they are along the line of the destroying aspect—it will be apparent to you that the method employed is that of the utilisation of the group Will.  It will be equally apparent that the group Will can only make its appearance under the Law of Occult Continuity when, and if, the group is functioning intelligently and demonstrating love adequately.

We now come to the third factor which group initiation involves.  This is diversity in unity, consciously recognised [Page 213] and utilised.  A group is not composed of disciples all of whom are being prepared for the same initiation.  This is oft a hard saying for group members to accept.  The significance of my earlier statement, that a group is composed of men and women all of whom are at the same point in evolution, is a generalisation and simply means that all of them have reached the point where they are pledged and unalterably committed to the work of the Ashram, under some particular Master.

The work, however, requires a diversity of quality and of potencies in order to be effective in manifestation upon the outer plane.  It needs those who are in close contact with the Master, and are therefore initiates of a certain standing; it needs also those who have facility of relationship with the inner Ashram and are therefore senior disciples, though not necessarily high initiates; it needs also those not so advanced upon the Path of Discipleship because they have, or can establish, a close connection with ordinary humanity in the life of everyday.  A group of disciples such as this is consequently a miniature hierarchy, and a hierarchy exists in its various degrees in order to permit of a wide range of effective relationships.  Ponder on this statement.  You can see now why there is necessity for the elimination of personality reactions, for only thus could the groups function as a coordinated unit with the various members recognising each other's status and yet not moved to jealousy or belittlement thereby; the work is then carried forward on the basis of inspiration, coordination and practical application.  The senior members of the group, and those with the most advanced status (whatever that may be), provide the incentive of the Plan as they receive it from the Master; the more experienced among the disciples then coordinate the Plan within the group, relating it to the Ashram and indicating its approach to the world of men; the neophytes—pledged and dedicated though yet without experience—carry out the Plan upon the physical plane.  This entails, as you can see, smooth and effective coordination, a proper attention to the general picture, and an application of the detail of [Page 214] work to the immediate necessity.  It is a hard task for a group of intensely individualistic disciples (and all disciples are individual) to begin to take the first steps towards these attitudes and the relationships which distinguish the Hierarchy as a whole.

Still another important factor in the group preparation for initiation is the cultivation of silence.  How, we ask ourselves at times when the functioning of the Ashram is under discussion, can we train our disciples to realise that, essentially, silence is not refraining from speech.  So many disciples seem to think that it is, and that they have to learn not to talk if they hope to take initiation.  Some would do a great deal better if they talked more than they do—along right lines.  The silence imposed in an Ashram is refraining from certain lines of thought, the elimination of reverie and the unwholesome use of the creative imagination.  Speech is consequently controlled at its source, because speech is the result of certain inner sources of ideas, of thought and of imagination; it is the precipitation (at a certain point of saturation, if I might so express it) of inner reservoirs which overflow on to the physical plane.  The retention of speech and the suppression of words, if they are the result of a realisation that what is to be said is wrong, or undesirable, or unwise, or wasteful, of energy will simply increase the inner banking up and will lead eventually to a still more violent display of words at a later date; it may also bring about serious and disastrous conditions within the astral body of the disciple.  The silence of thought is to be cultivated and, my brothers, I do not mean silent thinking.  I mean that certain lines of thought are refused admission; certain habits of thinking are eradicated and certain approaches to ideas are not developed.  This is done by a process of substitution, and not by a violent process of suppression.  The initiate learns to keep his thought apparatus in a certain effective condition.  His thoughts do not intermingle the one with the other, but are contained (if I may thus pictorially word it) in separate compartments or carefully filed for reference and later use.  There are certain [Page 215] layers of thought (again speaking symbolically) which are held within the Ashram itself and are never permitted to enter the mind of the disciple or the initiate when not consciously working in the Ashram; others are related to the group and its work and are given free play within the group ring-pass-not; still others are of a more mundane nature and govern the daily life and relationships of the disciple with personalities and with the affairs of civilised living and physical plane events.  These are only indications of what I mean, but will suffice to show (if you duly meditate) a little of what is meant by the silence of the initiate.  Within the permitted levels of contact, speech is free and unimpeded; outside those levels, no indication is given that the other spheres of thought activity, with their conditioning speech, even exist.  Such is the silence of the initiated disciple.

We have therefore considered briefly but suggestively four qualities which a group preparing for initiation needs to develop, to consider and unitedly to achieve.  They are:

1. The achieving of a non-sentimental group interrelation.

2. Learning how to use the forces of destruction constructively.

3. Attaining the power to work as a miniature Hierarchy, and as a group to exemplify unity in diversity. 

4. Cultivating the potency of occult silence.

 (Alice Bailey, The Rays and the Initiations, pp. 208-215)


Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια: